Re: [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file
flat view
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-05 15:31:40
Also in:
linux-media, linux-pci
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:37:39PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
On 2021/8/5 7:49, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 09:47:06PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:quoted
PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 says that if an Endpoint supports sending Requests to other Endpoints (as opposed to host memory), the Endpoint must not send 10-Bit Tag Requests to another given Endpoint unless an implementation-specific mechanism determines that the Endpoint supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. Add a 10bit_tag sysfs file, write 0 to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester when the driver does not bind the device if the peer device does not support the 10-Bit Tag Completer. This will make P2P traffic safe. the 10bit_tag file content indicate current 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable status. Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <redacted> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 16 +++++++- drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci index 793cbb7..0e0c97d 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Description: binary file containing the Vital Product Data for the device. It should follow the VPD format defined in PCI Specification 2.1 or 2.2, but users should consider - that some devices may have incorrectly formatted data. + that some devices may have incorrectly formatted data. If the underlying VPD has a writable section then the corresponding section of this file will be writable.@@ -407,3 +407,17 @@ Description: The file is writable if the PF is bound to a driver that implements ->sriov_set_msix_vec_count(). + +What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../10bit_tag +Date: August 2021 +Contact: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com> +Description: + If a PCI device support 10-Bit Tag Requester, will create the + 10bit_tag sysfs file. The file is readable, the value + indicate current 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable. + 1 - enabled, 0 - disabled. + + The file is also writeable, the value only accept by write 0 + to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester when the driver does not bind + the deivce. The typical use case is for p2pdma when the peer + device does not support 10-BIT Tag Completer.
quoted
quoted
+static ssize_t pci_10bit_tag_store(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); + bool enable; + + if (kstrtobool(buf, &enable) < 0) + return -EINVAL; + + if (enable != false ) + return -EINVAL;Is this the same as "if (enable)"?Yes, Will fix.
I actually don't like the one-way nature of this. When the hierarchy supports 10-bit tags, we automatically enable them during enumeration. Then we provide this sysfs file, but it can only *disable* 10-bit tags. There's no way to re-enable them except by rebooting (or using setpci, I guess). Why can't we allow *enabling* them here if they're supported in this hierarchy?
quoted
quoted
+ if (pdev->driver) + return -EBUSY; + + pcie_capability_clear_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN); + pci_info(pdev, "disabled 10-Bit Tag Requester\n"); + + return count; +}