Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 1/3] Add, show, link, remove IOAM namespaces and schemas
From: Justin Iurman <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-29 16:41:44
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static void print_schema(struct rtattr *attrs[]) +{ + __u8 data[IOAM6_MAX_SCHEMA_DATA_LEN + 1]; + int len; + + print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "schema", "schema %u", + rta_getattr_u32(attrs[IOAM6_ATTR_SC_ID])); + + if (attrs[IOAM6_ATTR_NS_ID]) + print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "namespace", " [namespace %u]", + rta_getattr_u16(attrs[IOAM6_ATTR_NS_ID])); + + len = RTA_PAYLOAD(attrs[IOAM6_ATTR_SC_DATA]); + memcpy(data, RTA_DATA(attrs[IOAM6_ATTR_SC_DATA]), len); + data[len] = '\0'; + + print_string(PRINT_ANY, "data", ", data \"%s\"", (const char *)data);The attribute descriptions shows this as binary data, not a string.Indeed. Maybe should I print it as hex... What do you think is more appropriate for this?./tc/em_meta.c has print_binary() but it is not json aware. devlink has pr_out_binary_value which is close. You could probably take this one and generalize it.
Right, I'll take a look.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+int do_ioam6(int argc, char **argv) +{ + bool maybe_wide = false; + + if (argc < 1 || matches(*argv, "help") == 0) + usage(); + + memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts)); + + if (matches(*argv, "namespace") == 0) {matches has been shown to be quite frail. Convenient for shorthand typing commands, but frail in the big picture. We should stop using it - especially for new commands.Sure. What do you suggest as an alternative?full strcmp.
I see. But, in that case, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to directly modify "matches" internally so that we keep consistency between modules without changing everything. Thoughts?