Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect(): extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags
flat view
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-06-10 10:04:20
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 06:30:36AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:quoted
This patch extends the flags of the phy that's being connected with the port specific flags of the switch port. This is needed to handle a port specific erratum of the KSZ8873 switch, which is added in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> --- drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 2 +- net/dsa/slave.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c index 96d8e88b4e46..167c2277814f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c@@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int phylink_attach_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy, if (pl->phydev) return -EBUSY; - return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, 0, interface); + return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, phy->dev_flags, interface);I don't think this has any benefit. phy_attach_direct() does this internally: phydev->dev_flags |= flags; which means the above change is effectively doing: phydev->dev_flags |= phydev->dev_flags; So, are you sure you need this?
Ah, good point. Back for two years, phy_attach_direct() was doing phydev->dev_flags = flags; I didn't noticed this change. Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |