Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net/sched: act_vlan: No dump for unset priority

Hi Jacub,

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:21:36PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Sun, 30 May 2021 14:40:51 +0300 Boris Sukholitko wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/net/sched/act_vlan.c b/net/sched/act_vlan.c
index a108469c664f..ccd1acfa4c55 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_vlan.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_vlan.c

@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ static int tcf_vlan_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
 	    (nla_put_u16(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_ID, p->tcfv_push_vid) ||
 	     nla_put_be16(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PROTOCOL,
 			  p->tcfv_push_proto) ||
-	     (nla_put_u8(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY,
-					      p->tcfv_push_prio))))
+	     (p->tcfv_push_prio_exists &&
+	      nla_put_u8(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY, p->tcfv_push_prio))))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
 	if (p->tcfv_action == TCA_VLAN_ACT_PUSH_ETH) {

@@ -362,10 +362,19 @@ static int tcf_vlan_search(struct net *net, struct tc_action **a, u32 index)
 
 static size_t tcf_vlan_get_fill_size(const struct tc_action *act)
 {
-	return nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_vlan))
+	struct tcf_vlan *v = to_vlan(act);
+	struct tcf_vlan_params *p;
+	size_t ret = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_vlan))
 		+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) /* TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_ID */
-		+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) /* TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PROTOCOL */
-		+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)); /* TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY */
+		+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)); /* TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PROTOCOL */
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&v->tcf_lock);
+	p = rcu_dereference_protected(v->vlan_p, lockdep_is_held(&v->tcf_lock));
+	if (p->tcfv_push_prio_exists)
+		ret += nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)); /* TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY */
+	spin_unlock_bh(&v->tcf_lock);

This jumps out a little bit - if we need to take this lock to inspect
tcf_vlan_params, then I infer its value may change. And if it may
change what guarantees it doesn't change between calculating the skb
length and dumping?

It's common practice to calculate the max skb len required when
attributes are this small.

I believe you are right.

I've just sent out v4 of the patch with tcf_vlan_get_fill_size change
reverted.

Thanks,
Boris.