Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-04-29

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add timestamping support

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-04-29 15:12:07
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:30:13PM +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
+#define VEND1_LTC_WR_NSEC_0		0x1106
+#define VEND1_LTC_WR_NSEC_1		0x1107
+#define VEND1_LTC_WR_SEC_0		0x1108
+#define VEND1_LTC_WR_SEC_1		0x1109
+
+#define VEND1_LTC_RD_NSEC_0		0x110A
+#define VEND1_LTC_RD_NSEC_1		0x110B
+#define VEND1_LTC_RD_SEC_0		0x110C
+#define VEND1_LTC_RD_SEC_1		0x110D
Weird ...
 struct nxp_c45_phy {
+	struct phy_device *phydev;
+	struct mii_timestamper mii_ts;
+	struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock;
+	struct ptp_clock_info caps;
+	struct sk_buff_head tx_queue;
+	struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
+	/* used to read the LTC counter atomic */
+	struct mutex ltc_read_lock;
+	/* used to write the LTC counter atomic */
+	struct mutex ltc_write_lock;
You are sure that the RD and WR banks are completely independent?  In
any case, I think a single lock would be fine, because contention is
normally very low.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	int hwts_tx;
+	int hwts_rx;
 	u32 tx_delay;
 	u32 rx_delay;
 };
@@ -110,6 +211,353 @@ struct nxp_c45_phy_stats {
 	u16		mask;
 };
 
+static bool nxp_c45_poll_txts(struct phy_device *phydev)
+{
+	return phydev->irq <= 0;
+}
+
+static int nxp_c45_ptp_gettimex64(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
+				  struct timespec64 *ts,
+				  struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts)
+{
+	struct nxp_c45_phy *priv = container_of(ptp, struct nxp_c45_phy, caps);
+
+	mutex_lock(&priv->ltc_read_lock);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_LOAD_CTRL,
+		      READ_LTC);
+	ts->tv_nsec = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+				   VEND1_LTC_RD_NSEC_0);
+	ts->tv_nsec |= phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+				    VEND1_LTC_RD_NSEC_1) << 16;
+	ts->tv_sec = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+				  VEND1_LTC_RD_SEC_0);
+	ts->tv_sec |= phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+				   VEND1_LTC_RD_SEC_1) << 16;
+	mutex_unlock(&priv->ltc_read_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int nxp_c45_ptp_settime64(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
+				 const struct timespec64 *ts)
+{
+	struct nxp_c45_phy *priv = container_of(ptp, struct nxp_c45_phy, caps);
+
+	mutex_lock(&priv->ltc_write_lock);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_WR_NSEC_0,
+		      ts->tv_nsec);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_WR_NSEC_1,
+		      ts->tv_nsec >> 16);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_WR_SEC_0,
+		      ts->tv_sec);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_WR_SEC_1,
+		      ts->tv_sec >> 16);
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_LTC_LOAD_CTRL,
+		      LOAD_LTC);
+	mutex_unlock(&priv->ltc_write_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int nxp_c45_ptp_adjfine(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, long scaled_ppm)
+{
+	struct nxp_c45_phy *priv = container_of(ptp, struct nxp_c45_phy, caps);
+	s32 ppb = scaled_ppm_to_ppb(scaled_ppm);
+	u64 subns_inc_val;
+	bool inc;
+
+	inc = ppb >= 0 ? true : false;
+	ppb = abs(ppb);
+
+	subns_inc_val = PPM_TO_SUBNS_INC(ppb);
+
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_RATE_ADJ_SUBNS_0,
+		      subns_inc_val);
+	subns_inc_val >>= 16;
+	subns_inc_val |= CLK_RATE_ADJ_LD;
+	if (inc)
+		subns_inc_val |= CLK_RATE_ADJ_DIR;
+
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_RATE_ADJ_SUBNS_1,
+		      subns_inc_val);
This needs a mutex to protect against concurrent callers.
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int nxp_c45_ptp_adjtime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s64 delta)
+{
+	struct timespec64 now, then;
+
+	then = ns_to_timespec64(delta);
+	nxp_c45_ptp_gettimex64(ptp, &now, NULL);
+	now = timespec64_add(now, then);
+	nxp_c45_ptp_settime64(ptp, &now);
Locking needed here, too.  You will need an unlocked version of
nxp_c45_ptp_settime64(), named like _nxp_c45_ptp_settime64() for
example.
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void nxp_c45_reconstruct_ts(struct timespec64 *ts,
+				   struct nxp_c45_hwts *hwts)
+{
+	ts->tv_nsec = hwts->nsec;
+	if ((ts->tv_sec & TS_SEC_MASK) < (hwts->sec & TS_SEC_MASK))
+		ts->tv_sec -= BIT(2);
+	ts->tv_sec &= ~TS_SEC_MASK;
+	ts->tv_sec |= hwts->sec & TS_SEC_MASK;
+}
+
+static bool nxp_c45_match_ts(struct ptp_header *header,
+			     struct nxp_c45_hwts *hwts,
+			     unsigned int type)
+{
+	return ntohs(header->sequence_id) == hwts->sequence_id &&
+	       ptp_get_msgtype(header, type) == hwts->msg_type &&
+	       header->domain_number  == hwts->domain_number;
+}
+
+static bool nxp_c45_get_hwtxts(struct nxp_c45_phy *priv,
+			       struct nxp_c45_hwts *hwts)
+{
+	bool valid;
+	u16 reg;
This function is called from both interrupt and thread context.  It
needs locking.  I suggest a single mutex that protects concurrent
access to any PHY registers.
+	phy_write_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_EGR_RING_CTRL,
+		      RING_DONE);
+	reg = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_EGR_RING_DATA_0);
+	valid = !!(reg & RING_DATA_0_TS_VALID);
+	if (!valid)
+		return valid;
+
+	hwts->domain_number = reg;
+	hwts->msg_type = (reg & RING_DATA_0_MSG_TYPE) >> 8;
+	hwts->sec = (reg & RING_DATA_0_SEC_4_2) >> 10;
+	hwts->sequence_id = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+					 VEND1_EGR_RING_DATA_1_SEQ_ID);
+	hwts->nsec = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+				  VEND1_EGR_RING_DATA_2_NSEC_15_0);
+	reg = phy_read_mmd(priv->phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_EGR_RING_DATA_3);
+	hwts->nsec |= (reg & RING_DATA_3_NSEC_29_16) << 16;
+	hwts->sec |= (reg & RING_DATA_3_SEC_1_0) >> 14;
+
+	return valid;
+}
+
+static void nxp_c45_process_txts(struct nxp_c45_phy *priv,
+				 struct nxp_c45_hwts *txts)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp, *skb_match = NULL;
+	struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
+	struct timespec64 ts;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ts_match;
+	s64 ts_ns;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
+	skb_queue_walk_safe(&priv->tx_queue, skb, tmp) {
+		ts_match = nxp_c45_match_ts(NXP_C45_SKB_CB(skb)->header, txts,
+					    NXP_C45_SKB_CB(skb)->type);
+		if (!ts_match)
+			continue;
+		skb_match = skb;
+		__skb_unlink(skb, &priv->tx_queue);
+		break;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_queue.lock, flags);
+
+	if (skb_match) {
+		nxp_c45_ptp_gettimex64(&priv->caps, &ts, NULL);
+		nxp_c45_reconstruct_ts(&ts, txts);
+		memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
+		ts_ns = timespec64_to_ns(&ts);
+		shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(ts_ns);
+		skb_complete_tx_timestamp(skb_match, &shhwtstamps);
+	} else {
+		phydev_warn(priv->phydev,
+			    "the tx timestamp doesn't match with any skb\n");
+	}
+}
+
+static long nxp_c45_do_aux_work(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
+{
+	struct nxp_c45_phy *priv = container_of(ptp, struct nxp_c45_phy, caps);
+	bool poll_txts = nxp_c45_poll_txts(priv->phydev);
+	struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps_rx;
+	struct nxp_c45_hwts hwts;
+	bool reschedule = false;
+	struct timespec64 ts;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	bool txts_valid;
+	u32 ts_raw;
+
+	while (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&priv->tx_queue) && poll_txts) {
+		txts_valid = nxp_c45_get_hwtxts(priv, &hwts);
+		if (unlikely(!txts_valid)) {
+			/* Still more skbs in the queue */
+			reschedule = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		nxp_c45_process_txts(priv, &hwts);
+	}
+
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->rx_queue)) != NULL) {
+		nxp_c45_ptp_gettimex64(&priv->caps, &ts, NULL);
Probably better to to move this call before the 'while' loop.
+		ts_raw = __be32_to_cpu(NXP_C45_SKB_CB(skb)->header->reserved2);
+		hwts.sec = ts_raw >> 30;
+		hwts.nsec = ts_raw & GENMASK(29, 0);
+		nxp_c45_reconstruct_ts(&ts, &hwts);
+		shhwtstamps_rx = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
+		shhwtstamps_rx->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(timespec64_to_ns(&ts));
+		NXP_C45_SKB_CB(skb)->header->reserved2 = 0;
+		netif_rx_ni(skb);
+	}
+
+	return reschedule ? 1 : -1;
+}
Thanks,
Richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help