Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:19, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 41671af6b33f..2b5f89713e36 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static int rxrpc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
switch (rx->sk.sk_state) {
case RXRPC_UNBOUND:
rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND;
+ break;
case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
case RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND:
break;