Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-30

RE: [Patch bpf-next v7 04/13] skmsg: avoid lock_sock() in sk_psock_backlog()

From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-03-29 19:42:26
Also in: bpf

Cong Wang wrote:
From: Cong Wang <redacted>

We do not have to lock the sock to avoid losing sk_socket,
instead we can purge all the ingress queues when we close
the socket. Sending or receiving packets after orphaning
socket makes no sense.

We do purge these queues when psock refcnt reaches zero but
here we want to purge them explicitly in sock_map_close().
There are also some nasty race conditions on testing bit
SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED and queuing/canceling the psock work,
we can expand psock->ingress_lock a bit to protect them too.

As noticed by John, we still have to lock the psock->work,
because the same work item could be running concurrently on
different CPU's.

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted>
---
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help