On Wed 31 Mar 2021 at 07:40, Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:55 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index b919826939e0..43cceb924976 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -1042,6 +1042,9 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
if (err != ACT_P_CREATED)
module_put(a_o->owner);
+ if (!bind && ovr && err == ACT_P_CREATED)
+ refcount_set(&a->tcfa_refcnt, 2);
+
Hmm, if we set the refcnt to 2 here, how could tcf_action_destroy()
destroy them when we rollback from a failure in the middle of the loop
in tcf_action_init()?
Thanks.
Hmm, you might be right. Also, the error handling code in
tcf_action_init() looks incorrect:
err:
tcf_action_destroy(actions, bind);
err_mod:
for (i = 0; i < TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO; i++) {
if (ops[i])
module_put(ops[i]->owner);
}
return err;
It looks like here the modules for all actions that successfully
completed their init has already been release by either
tcf_action_init_1() on action overwrite or by tcf_action_destroy() on
action create. I'll try to come up with tests that validate these corner
cases.
Regards,
Vlad