Re: [mm, net-next v2] mm: net: memcg accounting for TCP rx zerocopy
From: Arjun Roy <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-24 22:22:12
Also in:
cgroups, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Shakeel Butt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Arjun Roy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
[...]quoted
To summarize then, it seems to me that we're on the same page now. I'll put together a tentative v3 such that: 1. It uses pre-charging, as previously discussed. 2. It uses a page flag to delineate pages of a certain networking sort (ie. this mechanism). 3. It avails itself of up to 4 words of data inside struct page, inside the networking specific struct. 4. And it sets up this opt-in lifecycle notification for drivers that choose to use it, falling back to existing behaviour without.Arjun, if you don't mind, can you explain how the lifetime of such a page will look like? For example: Driver: page = dev_alloc_page() /* page has 1 ref */
Yes, this is the case.
dev_map_page(page) /* I don't think dev_map_page() takes a ref on page, so the ref remains 1. */
To be clear, do you mean things like DMA setup here? Or specifically what do you mean by dev_map_page?
On incoming traffic the page goes to skb and which then gets assigned to a struct sock. Does the kernel increase refcnt of the page on these operations?
Adding a page to an skb will mean that, when the skb is cleaned up, a page ref is dropped: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/net/core/skbuff.c#L666 So a driver may bump the refcount for the page, before adding it to the skb: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c#L442
The page gets mapped into user space which increments its refcnt.
Yes.
After processing the data, the application unmaps the page and its refcnt will be decremented.
Yes.
__put_page() will be called when refcnt reaches 0, so, the initial refcnt which the driver has acquired, has to be transferred to the next layer. So, I am trying to understand how that will work?
Ah, I see - there was a miscommunication. Johannes mentioned __put_page() but I read put_page(). That is where I was planning on adding the interposition for these network pages. So in put_page(), if it turns out it's a network page, we do our handling then as I described in prior emails. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, -Arjun