Re: [Patch bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: clean up sockmap related Kconfigs
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-19 18:47:10
Also in:
bpf
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:25 AM Jakub Sitnicki [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 07:42 AM CET, Cong Wang wrote:quoted
From: Cong Wang <redacted> As suggested by John, clean up sockmap related Kconfigs: Reduce the scope of CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER down to TCP stream parser, to reflect its name. Make the rest sockmap code simply depend on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. And leave CONFIG_NET_SOCK_MSG untouched, as it is used by non-sockmap cases. Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Reviewed-by: Lorenz Bauer <redacted> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted> ---Sorry for the delay. There's a lot happening here. Took me a while to dig through it. I have a couple of nit-picks, which easily can be addressed as follow-ups, and one comment.
No problem, it is not merged, so V5 is definitely not a problem.
sock_map_prog_update and sk_psock_done_strp are only used in net/core/sock_map.c and can be static.
1. This seems to be unrelated to this patch? But I am still happy to address it. 2. sk_psock_done_strp() is in skmsg.c, hence why it is non-static. And I believe it fits in skmsg.c better than in sock_map.c, because it operates on psock rather than sock_map itself. So, I can make sock_map_prog_update() static in a separate patch and carry it in V5.
[...]quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c index bc7d2a586e18..b2c4865eb39b 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c@@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ int tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir); -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER static bool tcp_bpf_stream_read(const struct sock *sk) { struct sk_psock *psock;@@ -561,8 +560,10 @@ static void tcp_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto prot[TCP_BPF_NUM_CFGS], struct proto *base) { prot[TCP_BPF_BASE] = *base; +#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].unhash = sock_map_unhash; prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].close = sock_map_close; +#endif prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].recvmsg = tcp_bpf_recvmsg; prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].stream_memory_read = tcp_bpf_stream_read;@@ -629,4 +630,3 @@ void tcp_bpf_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk) if (prot == &tcp_bpf_prots[family][TCP_BPF_BASE]) newsk->sk_prot = sk->sk_prot_creator; } -#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER */net/core/sock_map.o now is built only when CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is set. While tcp_bpf_get_proto is only called from net/core/sock_map.o. Seems there is no sense in compiling tcp_bpf_get_proto, and everything it depends on which was enclosed by CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER check, when CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is unset.
I can try but I am definitely not sure whether kTLS is happy about it, clearly kTLS at least uses __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() and tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir().
quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c index 7a94791efc1a..e635ccc175ca 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c@@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ static struct proto udp_bpf_prots[UDP_BPF_NUM_PROTS]; static void udp_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto *prot, const struct proto *base) { *prot = *base; +#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) prot->unhash = sock_map_unhash; prot->close = sock_map_close; +#endif } static void udp_bpf_check_v6_needs_rebuild(struct proto *ops)Same situation here but for udp_bpf_get_proto.
UDP is different, as kTLS certainly doesn't and won't use it. I think udp_bpf.c can be just put under CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. Thanks.