On 11.02.2021 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
@@ -162,13 +162,15 @@ irqreturn_t xenvif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct xenvif_queue *queue = dev_id;
int old;
+ bool has_rx, has_tx;
old = atomic_fetch_or(NETBK_COMMON_EOI, &queue->eoi_pending);
WARN(old, "Interrupt while EOI pending\n");
- /* Use bitwise or as we need to call both functions. */
- if ((!xenvif_handle_tx_interrupt(queue) |
- !xenvif_handle_rx_interrupt(queue))) {
+ has_tx = xenvif_handle_tx_interrupt(queue);
+ has_rx = xenvif_handle_rx_interrupt(queue);
+
+ if (!has_rx && !has_tx) {
atomic_andnot(NETBK_COMMON_EOI, &queue->eoi_pending);
xen_irq_lateeoi(irq, XEN_EOI_FLAG_SPURIOUS);
}
Ah yes, what was originally meant really was
if (!(xenvif_handle_tx_interrupt(queue) |
xenvif_handle_rx_interrupt(queue))) {
(also hinted at by the otherwise pointless inner parentheses),
which you simply write in an alternative way.
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <redacted>
Jan