[PATCH v3 net-next 08/11] net: bridge: put SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS on the blocking call chain
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-02-10 09:27:41
Also in:
bridge, linux-omap, lkml
Subsystem:
ethernet bridge, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
Nikolay Aleksandrov, Ido Schimmel, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Since we would like br_switchdev_set_port_flag to not use an atomic notifier, it should be called from outside spinlock context. We can temporarily drop br->lock, but that creates some concurrency complications (example below is given for sysfs): - There might be an "echo 1 > multicast_flood" simultaneous with an "echo 0 > multicast_flood". The result of this is nondeterministic either way, so I'm not too concerned as long as the result is consistent (no other flags have changed). - There might be an "echo 1 > multicast_flood" simultaneous with an "echo 0 > learning". My expectation is that none of the two writes are "eaten", and the final flags contain BR_MCAST_FLOOD=1 and BR_LEARNING=0 regardless of the order of execution. That is actually possible if, on the commit path, we don't do a trivial "p->flags = flags" which might overwrite bits outside of our mask, but instead we just change the flags corresponding to our mask. Now that br_switchdev_set_port_flag is never called from under br->lock, it runs in sleepable context. All switchdev drivers handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET as both blocking and atomic, so no changes are needed on that front. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> --- Changes in v3: - Drop the br->lock around br_switchdev_set_port_flag in this patch, for both sysfs and netlink. - Only set/restore the masked bits in p->flags to avoid concurrency issues. Changes in v2: Patch is new. net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 10 +++++++--- net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 5 ++--- net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index b7731614c036..8f09106966c4 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void br_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[], static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[], struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { - unsigned long old_flags, changed_mask; + unsigned long flags, old_flags, changed_mask; bool br_vlan_tunnel_old; int err;
@@ -896,10 +896,14 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[], br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_ISOLATED, BR_ISOLATED); changed_mask = old_flags ^ p->flags; + flags = p->flags; - err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, p->flags, changed_mask, extack); + spin_unlock_bh(&p->br->lock); + err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, changed_mask, extack); + spin_lock_bh(&p->br->lock); if (err) { - p->flags = old_flags; + p->flags &= ~changed_mask; + p->flags |= (old_flags & changed_mask); goto out; }
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
index dbd94156960f..a79164ee65b9 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c@@ -79,9 +79,8 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, attr.u.brport_flags.val = flags & mask; attr.u.brport_flags.mask = mask; - /* We run from atomic context here */ - err = call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET, p->dev, - &info.info, extack); + err = call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET, p->dev, + &info.info, extack); err = notifier_to_errno(err); if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) return 0;
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
index 72e92376eef1..3f21fdd1cdaa 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c@@ -68,16 +68,22 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v, else flags &= ~mask; - if (flags != p->flags) { - err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask, &extack); - if (err) { - netdev_err(p->dev, "%s\n", extack._msg); - return err; - } + if (flags == p->flags) + return 0; - p->flags = flags; - br_port_flags_change(p, mask); + spin_unlock_bh(&p->br->lock); + err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask, &extack); + spin_lock_bh(&p->br->lock); + if (err) { + netdev_err(p->dev, "%s\n", extack._msg); + return err; } + + p->flags &= ~mask; + p->flags |= (flags & mask); + + br_port_flags_change(p, mask); + return 0; }
--
2.25.1