Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] arm/arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-05 20:04:57
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 2021-02-05 11:19, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:00AM +0000, Steven Price wrote:quoted
On 02/02/2021 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) { + if (res.a0 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a1 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a2 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a3 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);The bit shifts are missing, the tests should be of the form: if (res.a0 & (1 << i)) Or indeed using a BIT() macro.Maybe even test_bit()?Actually, maybe not doing things a-bit-at-a-time is less error prone. See below what I intend to fold in. Thanks, M.diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.cb/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c index 00bf3c7969fc..08836f2f39ee 100644--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "smccc: KVM: " fmt -#include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h> +#include <linux/bitmap.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/string.h>@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(__kvm_arm_hyp_services,ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS) __ro_afte void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void) { - int i; struct arm_smccc_res res; + u32 val[4]; if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC) return;@@ -28,16 +28,13 @@ void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void) memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res)); arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, &res); - for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) { - if (res.a0 & (i)) - set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); - if (res.a1 & (i)) - set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); - if (res.a2 & (i)) - set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); - if (res.a3 & (i)) - set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); - } + + val[0] = lower_32_bits(res.a0); + val[1] = lower_32_bits(res.a1); + val[2] = lower_32_bits(res.a2); + val[3] = lower_32_bits(res.a3); + + bitmap_from_arr32(__kvm_arm_hyp_services, val, ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS);
Nice! That's loads better. Will