Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2021-02-05

Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] arm/arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-05 11:27:56
Also in: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:00AM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
On 02/02/2021 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..23ce1ded88b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "smccc: KVM: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(__kvm_arm_hyp_services, ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS) __ro_after_init = { };
+
+void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+	if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC)
+		return;
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res);
+	if (res.a0 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_0 ||
+	    res.a1 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_1 ||
+	    res.a2 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_2 ||
+	    res.a3 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_3)
+		return;
+
+	memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res));
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, &res);
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
+		if (res.a0 & (i))
+			set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
+		if (res.a1 & (i))
+			set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
+		if (res.a2 & (i))
+			set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
+		if (res.a3 & (i))
+			set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
The bit shifts are missing, the tests should be of the form:

	if (res.a0 & (1 << i))

Or indeed using a BIT() macro.
Maybe even test_bit()?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help