Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] arm/arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-05 11:27:56
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:00AM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
On 02/02/2021 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..23ce1ded88b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "smccc: KVM: " fmt + +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/string.h> + +static DECLARE_BITMAP(__kvm_arm_hyp_services, ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS) __ro_after_init = { }; + +void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void) +{ + int i; + struct arm_smccc_res res; + + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC) + return; + + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res); + if (res.a0 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_0 || + res.a1 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_1 || + res.a2 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_2 || + res.a3 != ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_3) + return; + + memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res)); + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, &res); + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) { + if (res.a0 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a1 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a2 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services); + if (res.a3 & (i)) + set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);The bit shifts are missing, the tests should be of the form: if (res.a0 & (1 << i)) Or indeed using a BIT() macro.
Maybe even test_bit()? Will