Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-05
STALE2064d REVIEWED: 1 (1M)

Revision v10 of 7 in this series; 1 review trailer.

Revisions (7)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v4 [diff vs current]
  4. v5 [diff vs current]
  5. v6 [diff vs current]
  6. v8 [diff vs current]
  7. v10 current

[PATCH net-next v10 1/3] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()

From: Wei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-04 21:32:20
Subsystem: networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> 

This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main
logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other
functions in later commits.
This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau [off-list ref] and
is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue
context.
This commit by itself is a code restructure.

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> 
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index aae116d059da..0fd40b9847c3 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6781,15 +6781,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del);
 
-static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
 {
-	void *have;
 	int work, weight;
 
-	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
-
-	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
-
 	weight = n->weight;
 
 	/* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race
@@ -6809,7 +6804,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 			    n->poll, work, weight);
 
 	if (likely(work < weight))
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 
 	/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
 	 * consume the entire weight.  In such cases this code
@@ -6818,7 +6813,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) {
 		napi_complete(n);
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
 	/* The NAPI context has more processing work, but busy-polling
@@ -6831,7 +6826,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 			 */
 			napi_schedule(n);
 		}
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
 	if (n->gro_bitmask) {
@@ -6849,12 +6844,29 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) {
 		pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n",
 			     n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog");
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
-	list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
+	*repoll = true;
+
+	return work;
+}
+
+static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+{
+	bool do_repoll = false;
+	void *have;
+	int work;
+
+	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
+
+	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
+
+	work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll);
+
+	if (do_repoll)
+		list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
 
-out_unlock:
 	netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
 
 	return work;
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help