Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 4 authors, 2021-02-06

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 01/15] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-29 17:22:24
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 5:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 7:48 AM Calvin Johnson
[off-list ref] wrote:
...
quoted
It would work, but I would introduce a wrapper around the _ADR
evaluation, something like:

int acpi_get_local_address(acpi_handle handle, u32 *addr)
{
      unsigned long long adr;
      acpi_status status;

      status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__ADR, NULL, &adr);
      if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
                return -ENODATA;

      *addr = (u32)adr;
      return 0;
}

in drivers/acpi/utils.c and add a static inline stub always returning
-ENODEV for it for !CONFIG_ACPI.
...
BTW, you may not need the fwnode_get_local_addr() at all then, just
evaluate either the "reg" property for OF or acpi_get_local_address()
for ACPI in the "caller" code directly. A common helper doing this can
be added later.
Sounds good to me and it will address your concern about different
semantics of reg/_ADR on per driver/subsystem basis.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help