On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:14:44PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:08:02 -0800 Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:27:54AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:06:01PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
The mvpp2 is an Ethernet driver, and it implements MAC style time
stamping of PTP frames. It has no need of the expensive option to
enable PHY time stamping. Remove the incorrect dependency.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Fixes: 91dd71950bd7 ("net: mvpp2: ptp: add TAI support")
NAK.
Can you please explain why mvpp2 requires NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMING?
Russell, I think we all agree now this is not the solution to the
problem of which entity should provide the timestamp, but the series
doesn't seem objectionable in itself.
Please LMK if you think otherwise.
(I would put it in net-next tho, given the above this at most a space
optimization.)
Correct - my NAK is on the basis that this series was put forward
as solving the issue I had raised, but in reality it does little
to achieve that.
It is, as you say, just a space optimisation, and I have no issue
with it being merged on that basis.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!