Re: [patch net-next RFC 00/10] introduce line card support for modular switch
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2021-01-20 08:39:00
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:51:49PM CET, andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:56:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:07:18AM CET, andrew@lunn.ch wrote:quoted
quoted
$ devlink lc provision netdevsim/netdevsim10 lc 0 type card4ports $ devlink lc netdevsim/netdevsim10: lc 0 state provisioned type card4ports supported_types: card1port card2ports card4ports lc 1 state unprovisioned supported_types: card1port card2ports card4portsHi Jiriquoted
# Now activate the line card using debugfs. That emulates plug-in event # on real hardware: $ echo "Y"> /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim10/linecards/0/active $ ip link show eni10nl0p1 165: eni10nl0p1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 7e:2d:05:93:d3:d1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff # The carrier is UP now.What is missing from the devlink lc view is what line card is actually in the slot. Say if i provision for a card4port, but actually insert a card2port. It would be nice to have something like:I checked, our hw does not support that. Only provides info that linecard activation was/wasn't successful.Hi Jiri Is this a firmware limitation? There is no API to extract the information from the firmware to the host? The firmware itself knows there is a mismatch and refuses to configure the line card, and prevents the MAC going up?
No, the FW does not know. The ASIC is not physically able to get the linecard type. Yes, it is odd, I agree. The linecard type is known to the driver which operates on i2c. This driver takes care of power management of the linecard, among other tasks.
Even if you cannot do this now, it seems likely in future firmware versions you will be able to, so maybe at least define the netlink
Sure, for netdevsim that is not problem. Our current hw does not support it, the future may.
attributes now? As well as attributes indicating activation was successful.
State "ACTIVATED" is that indication. It is in this RFC.
Andrew