Re: [patch net-next RFC 05/10] devlink: add port to line card relationship set

Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:10:48PM CET, idosch@idosch.org wrote:

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:12:17PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

quoted

index ec00cd94c626..cb911b6fdeda 100644

--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h

@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct devlink_port {
 	struct delayed_work type_warn_dw;
 	struct list_head reporter_list;
 	struct mutex reporters_lock; /* Protects reporter_list */
+	struct devlink_linecard *linecard;
 };
 
 struct devlink_linecard_ops;

@@ -1438,6 +1439,8 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 contro
 				   u16 pf, bool external);
 void devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 controller,
 				   u16 pf, u16 vf, bool external);
+void devlink_port_linecard_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
+			       struct devlink_linecard *linecard);
 struct devlink_linecard *
 devlink_linecard_create(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int linecard_index,
 			const struct devlink_linecard_ops *ops, void *priv);

diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 347976b88404..2faa30cc5cce 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c

@@ -855,6 +855,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 	if (devlink_nl_port_function_attrs_put(msg, devlink_port, extack))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
+	if (devlink_port->linecard &&
+	    nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_INDEX,
+			devlink_port->linecard->index))
+		goto nla_put_failure;
 
 	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
 	return 0;

@@ -8642,6 +8646,21 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 contro
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set);
 
+/**
+ *	devlink_port_linecard_set - Link port with a linecard
+ *
+ *	@devlink_port: devlink port
+ *	@devlink_linecard: devlink linecard
+ */
+void devlink_port_linecard_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
+			       struct devlink_linecard *linecard)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(devlink_port->registered))
+		return;
+	devlink_port->linecard = linecard;

We already have devlink_port_attrs_set() that is called before the port
is registered, why not extend it to also set the linecard information?

I was thinking about that. Looked odd to put the linecard pointer to the
attr struct. I like it better this way. But if you insist.

quoted

+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_linecard_set);
+
 static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
 					     char *name, size_t len)
 {

@@ -8654,7 +8673,11 @@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
 	switch (attrs->flavour) {
 	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
 	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_VIRTUAL:
-		n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->phys.port_number);
+		if (devlink_port->linecard)
+			n = snprintf(name, len, "l%u",
+				     devlink_port->linecard->index);
+		n += snprintf(name + n, len - n, "p%u",
+			      attrs->phys.port_number);
 		if (attrs->split)
 			n += snprintf(name + n, len - n, "s%u",
 				      attrs->phys.split_subport_number);

-- 
2.26.2