Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-01-15 23:56:32
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:46:22PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:24:35 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote:quoted
The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in mv88e6xxx is optional. This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it. v1 -> v2: - Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir). - Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir).If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3, LMK if I got it wrong.I don't think a v3 was supposed to be coming, what made you think that?I thought you concluded that the entire CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX_GLOBAL2 should go, you said:quoted
So, roughly, you save 10%/13k. That hardly justifies the complexity IMO.
That would be the first time that I hear of fixing a build failure due to a missing shim by refactoring a driver... Punctual issue, punctual fix, no?