Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-16

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-01-15 23:56:32

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:46:22PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:24:35 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
quoted
The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in
mv88e6xxx is optional.

This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware
actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it.

v1 -> v2:
- Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir).
- Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir).
If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3,
LMK if I got it wrong.
I don't think a v3 was supposed to be coming, what made you think that?
I thought you concluded that the entire CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX_GLOBAL2
should go, you said:
quoted
So, roughly, you save 10%/13k. That hardly justifies the complexity IMO.
That would be the first time that I hear of fixing a build failure due
to a missing shim by refactoring a driver... Punctual issue, punctual
fix, no?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help