Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-11

Re: [PATCH 2/7] ibmvnic: update reset function prototypes

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-11 19:33:32

On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:12:21 -0800 Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
Jakub Kicinski [kuba@kernel.org] wrote:
quoted
On Thu,  7 Jan 2021 23:12:31 -0800 Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:  
quoted
The reset functions need just the 'reset reason' parameter and not
the ibmvnic_rwi list element. Update the functions so we can simplify
the handling of the ->rwi_list in a follow-on patch.

Fixes: 2770a7984db5 ("ibmvnic: Introduce hard reset recovery")
  
No empty lines after Fixes tags, please. They should also not be
wrapped.  
Ah ok, will fix.
quoted
  
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <redacted>  
Are these patches for net or net-next? It looks like they are fixing
races, but at the same time they are rather large. Can you please
produce minimal fixes, e.g. patch 3 should just fix the existing leaks
rather than refactor the code to not do allocations. 130+ LoC is a lot
for a fix.  
This is a set of bug fixes, but yes a bit large. Should I submit to
net-next instead?
I'd rather you tried to address the problems with minimal patches, then
you can refactor the code in net-next.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help