Ido Schimmel [off-list ref] writes:
+Petr
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
static int mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
- struct switchdev_trans *trans,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan;
+ struct switchdev_trans trans;
int err = 0;
switch (obj->id) {
case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
vlan = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
- err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, trans,
+
Got the regression results. The call to mlxsw_sp_span_respin() should be
placed here because it needs to be triggered regardless of the return
value of mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add().
Agreed, the new code differs in that respin is not called on error path.