Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] net: sparx5: add the basic sparx5 driver
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2020-12-19 19:12:55
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
+static struct sparx5_io_resource sparx5_iomap[] = {This could be made const i think,.
+ { TARGET_DEV2G5, 0, 0 }, /* 0x610004000: dev2g5_0 */
+ { TARGET_DEV5G, 0x4000, 0 }, /* 0x610008000: dev5g_0 */
+ { TARGET_PCS5G_BR, 0x8000, 0 }, /* 0x61000c000: pcs5g_br_0 */
+ { TARGET_DEV2G5 + 1, 0xc000, 0 }, /* 0x610010000: dev2g5_1 */+static int sparx5_create_targets(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
+{
+ int idx, jdx;
+ struct resource *iores[IO_RANGES];
+ void __iomem *iomem[IO_RANGES];
+ void __iomem *begin[IO_RANGES];
+ int range_id[IO_RANGES];Reverse Christmas tree. idx, jdx need to come last.
+ + /* Check if done previously (deferred by serdes load) */ + if (sparx5->regs[sparx5_iomap[0].id]) + return 0;
Could you explain this a bit more. Do you mean -EPROBE_DEFER?
+static int sparx5_probe_port(struct sparx5 *sparx5,
+ struct device_node *portnp,
+ struct phy *serdes,
+ u32 portno,
+ struct sparx5_port_config *conf)
+{
+ struct sparx5_port *spx5_port;
+ struct net_device *ndev;
+ int err;
+
+ err = sparx5_create_targets(sparx5);
+ if (err)
+ return err;This sees odd here. Don't sparx5_create_targets() create all the targets, where as this creates one specific port? Seems like sparx5_create_targets() should be in the devices as a whole probe, not the port probe.
+ spx5_port = netdev_priv(ndev); + spx5_port->of_node = portnp; + spx5_port->serdes = serdes; + spx5_port->pvid = NULL_VID; + spx5_port->signd_internal = true; + spx5_port->signd_active_high = true; + spx5_port->signd_enable = true; + spx5_port->flow_control = false; + spx5_port->max_vlan_tags = SPX5_PORT_MAX_TAGS_NONE; + spx5_port->vlan_type = SPX5_VLAN_PORT_TYPE_UNAWARE; + spx5_port->custom_etype = 0x8880; /* Vitesse */ + conf->portmode = conf->phy_mode; + spx5_port->conf.speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN; + spx5_port->conf.power_down = true; + sparx5->ports[portno] = spx5_port; + return 0;
I'm also not sure this has the correct name. This does not look like a typical probe function.
+}
+
+static int sparx5_init_switchcore(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
+{
+ u32 value, pending, jdx, idx;
+ struct {
+ bool gazwrap;
+ void __iomem *init_reg;
+ u32 init_val;
+ } ram, ram_init_list[] = {
+ {false, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, ANA_AC_STAT_RESET),
+ ANA_AC_STAT_RESET_RESET},
+ {false, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, ASM_STAT_CFG),
+ ASM_STAT_CFG_STAT_CNT_CLR_SHOT},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, QSYS_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, REW_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, VOP_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, ANA_AC_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, ASM_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, EACL_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, VCAP_SUPER_RAM_INIT), 0},
+ {true, spx5_reg_get(sparx5, DSM_RAM_INIT), 0}
+ };Looks like this could be const as well. And this does not really fit reverse christmas tree.
+
+ spx5_rmw(EACL_POL_EACL_CFG_EACL_FORCE_INIT_SET(1),
+ EACL_POL_EACL_CFG_EACL_FORCE_INIT,
+ sparx5,
+ EACL_POL_EACL_CFG);
+
+ spx5_rmw(EACL_POL_EACL_CFG_EACL_FORCE_INIT_SET(0),
+ EACL_POL_EACL_CFG_EACL_FORCE_INIT,
+ sparx5,
+ EACL_POL_EACL_CFG);
+
+ /* Initialize memories, if not done already */
+ value = spx5_rd(sparx5, HSCH_RESET_CFG);
+
+ if (!(value & HSCH_RESET_CFG_CORE_ENA)) {
+ for (idx = 0; idx < 10; idx++) {
+ pending = ARRAY_SIZE(ram_init_list);
+ for (jdx = 0; jdx < ARRAY_SIZE(ram_init_list); jdx++) {
+ ram = ram_init_list[jdx];
+ if (ram.gazwrap)
+ ram.init_val = QSYS_RAM_INIT_RAM_INIT;
+
+ if (idx == 0) {
+ writel(ram.init_val, ram.init_reg);
+ } else {
+ value = readl(ram.init_reg);
+ if ((value & ram.init_val) !=
+ ram.init_val) {
+ pending--;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (!pending)
+ break;
+ usleep_range(USEC_PER_MSEC, 2 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
+ }You are getting pretty deeply nested here. Might be better to pull this out into a helpers.
+
+ if (pending > 0) {
+ /* Still initializing, should be complete in
+ * less than 1ms
+ */
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "Memory initialization error\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Reset counters */
+ spx5_wr(ANA_AC_STAT_RESET_RESET_SET(1), sparx5, ANA_AC_STAT_RESET);
+ spx5_wr(ASM_STAT_CFG_STAT_CNT_CLR_SHOT_SET(1), sparx5, ASM_STAT_CFG);
+
+ /* Enable switch-core and queue system */
+ spx5_wr(HSCH_RESET_CFG_CORE_ENA_SET(1), sparx5, HSCH_RESET_CFG);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sparx5_init_coreclock(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
+{
+ u32 clk_div, clk_period, pol_upd_int, idx;
+ enum sparx5_core_clockfreq freq = sparx5->coreclock;More reverse christmas tree. Please review the whole driver.
+
+ /* Verify if core clock frequency is supported on target.
+ * If 'VTSS_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT' then the highest supported
+ * freq. is used
+ */
+ switch (sparx5->target_ct) {
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7546:
+ if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT)
+ freq = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_250MHZ;
+ else if (sparx5->coreclock != SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_250MHZ)
+ freq = 0; /* Not supported */
+ break;
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7549:
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7552:
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7556:
+ if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT)
+ freq = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_500MHZ;
+ else if (sparx5->coreclock != SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_500MHZ)
+ freq = 0; /* Not supported */
+ break;
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7558:
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7558TSN:
+ if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT)
+ freq = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ;
+ else if (sparx5->coreclock != SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ)
+ freq = 0; /* Not supported */
+ break;
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7546TSN:
+ if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT)
+ freq = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ;
+ break;
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7549TSN:
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7552TSN:
+ case SPX5_TARGET_CT_7556TSN:
+ if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT)
+ freq = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ;
+ else if (sparx5->coreclock == SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_250MHZ)
+ freq = 0; /* Not supported */
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "Target (%#04x) not supported\n", sparx5->target_ct);netdev is staying with 80 character lines. Please fold this, here and every where else, where possible. The exception is, you should not split a string.
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ switch (freq) {
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_250MHZ:
+ clk_div = 10;
+ pol_upd_int = 312;
+ break;
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_500MHZ:
+ clk_div = 5;
+ pol_upd_int = 624;
+ break;
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ:
+ clk_div = 4;
+ pol_upd_int = 780;
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "%s: Frequency (%d) not supported on target (%#04x)\n",
+ __func__,
+ sparx5->coreclock, sparx5->target_ct);
+ return 0;-EINVAL? Or is it not fatal to use an unsupported frequency?
+static int sparx5_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
+{
+ u32 idx;
+
+ if (sparx5_create_targets(sparx5))
+ return -ENODEV;Hum, sparx5_create_targets() again?
+
+ /* Read chip ID to check CPU interface */
+ sparx5->chip_id = spx5_rd(sparx5, GCB_CHIP_ID);
+
+ sparx5->target_ct = (enum spx5_target_chiptype)
+ GCB_CHIP_ID_PART_ID_GET(sparx5->chip_id);
+
+ /* Initialize Switchcore and internal RAMs */
+ if (sparx5_init_switchcore(sparx5)) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "Switchcore initialization error\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Initialize the LC-PLL (core clock) and set affected registers */
+ if (sparx5_init_coreclock(sparx5)) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "LC-PLL initialization error\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup own UPSIDs */
+ for (idx = 0; idx < 3; idx++) {
+ spx5_wr(idx, sparx5, ANA_AC_OWN_UPSID(idx));
+ spx5_wr(idx, sparx5, ANA_CL_OWN_UPSID(idx));
+ spx5_wr(idx, sparx5, ANA_L2_OWN_UPSID(idx));
+ spx5_wr(idx, sparx5, REW_OWN_UPSID(idx));
+ }
+
+ /* Enable switch ports */
+ for (idx = SPX5_PORTS; idx < SPX5_PORTS_ALL; idx++) {
+ spx5_rmw(QFWD_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_PORT_ENA_SET(1),
+ QFWD_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_PORT_ENA,
+ sparx5,
+ QFWD_SWITCH_PORT_MODE(idx));
+ }What happens when you enable the ports? Why is this here, and not in the port specific open call?
+/* Some boards needs to map the SGPIO for signal detect explicitly to the
+ * port module
+ */
+static void sparx5_board_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
+{
+ int idx;
+
+ if (!sparx5->sd_sgpio_remapping)
+ return;
+
+ /* Enable SGPIO Signal Detect remapping */
+ spx5_rmw(GCB_HW_SGPIO_SD_CFG_SD_MAP_SEL,
+ GCB_HW_SGPIO_SD_CFG_SD_MAP_SEL,
+ sparx5,
+ GCB_HW_SGPIO_SD_CFG);
+
+ /* Refer to LOS SGPIO */
+ for (idx = 0; idx < SPX5_PORTS; idx++) {
+ if (sparx5->ports[idx]) {
+ if (sparx5->ports[idx]->conf.sd_sgpio != ~0) {
+ spx5_wr(sparx5->ports[idx]->conf.sd_sgpio,
+ sparx5,
+ GCB_HW_SGPIO_TO_SD_MAP_CFG(idx));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}I've not looked at how you do SFP integration yet. Is this the LOS from the SFP socket? Is there a Linux GPIO controller exported by this driver, so the SFP driver can use the GPIOs?
+
+static int mchp_sparx5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct sparx5 *sparx5;
+ struct device_node *ports, *portnp;
+ const u8 *mac_addr;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ if (!np && !pdev->dev.platform_data)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ sparx5 = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sparx5), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sparx5)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sparx5);
+ sparx5->pdev = pdev;
+ sparx5->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ /* Default values, some from DT */
+ sparx5->coreclock = SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_DEFAULT;
+
+ mac_addr = of_get_mac_address(np);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mac_addr)) {
+ dev_info(sparx5->dev, "MAC addr was not set, use random MAC\n");
+ eth_random_addr(sparx5->base_mac);
+ sparx5->base_mac[5] = 0;
+ } else {
+ ether_addr_copy(sparx5->base_mac, mac_addr);
+ }The binding document does not say anything about a MAC address at the top level. What is this used for? +
+ if (sparx5_init(sparx5)) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "Init failed\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ ports = of_get_child_by_name(np, "ethernet-ports");
+ if (!ports) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "no ethernet-ports child node found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ sparx5->port_count = of_get_child_count(ports);
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, portnp) {
+ struct sparx5_port_config config = {};
+ u32 portno;
+ struct phy *serdes;
+
+ err = of_property_read_u32(portnp, "reg", &portno);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "port reg property error\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+ err = of_property_read_u32(portnp, "max-speed",
+ &config.max_speed);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "port max-speed property error\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+ config.speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
+ err = of_property_read_u32(portnp, "sd_sgpio", &config.sd_sgpio);Not in the binding documentation. I think i need to withdraw my Reviewed-by :-(
+ if (err)
+ config.sd_sgpio = ~0;
+ else
+ sparx5->sd_sgpio_remapping = true;
+ serdes = devm_of_phy_get(sparx5->dev, portnp, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(serdes)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(serdes);
+ if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev,
+ "missing SerDes phys for port%d\n",
+ portno);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = of_get_phy_mode(portnp, &config.phy_mode);
+ if (err)
+ config.power_down = true;You should indicate in the binding it is optional. And what happens when it is missing.
+ config.media_type = ETH_MEDIA_DAC;
+ config.serdes_reset = true;
+ config.portmode = config.phy_mode;
+ err = sparx5_probe_port(sparx5, portnp, serdes, portno, &config);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(sparx5->dev, "port probe error\n");
+ goto cleanup_ports;
+ }
+ }
+ sparx5_board_init(sparx5);
+
+cleanup_ports:
+ return err;Seems missed named, no cleanup.
+static int __init sparx5_switch_reset(void)
+{
+ const char *syscon_cpu = "microchip,sparx5-cpu-syscon",
+ *syscon_gcb = "microchip,sparx5-gcb-syscon";
+ struct regmap *cpu_ctrl, *gcb_ctrl;
+ u32 val;
+
+ cpu_ctrl = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(syscon_cpu);
+ if (IS_ERR(cpu_ctrl)) {
+ pr_err("No '%s' syscon map\n", syscon_cpu);
+ return PTR_ERR(cpu_ctrl);
+ }
+
+ gcb_ctrl = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(syscon_gcb);
+ if (IS_ERR(gcb_ctrl)) {
+ pr_err("No '%s' syscon map\n", syscon_gcb);
+ return PTR_ERR(gcb_ctrl);
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure the core is PROTECTED from reset */
+ regmap_update_bits(cpu_ctrl, RESET_PROT_STAT,
+ SYS_RST_PROT_VCORE, SYS_RST_PROT_VCORE);
+
+ regmap_write(gcb_ctrl, spx5_offset(GCB_SOFT_RST),
+ GCB_SOFT_RST_SOFT_SWC_RST_SET(1));
+
+ return readx_poll_timeout(sparx5_read_gcb_soft_rst, gcb_ctrl, val,
+ GCB_SOFT_RST_SOFT_SWC_RST_GET(val) == 0,
+ 1, 100);
+}
+postcore_initcall(sparx5_switch_reset);That is pretty unusual. Why cannot this be done at probe time?
+/* Clock period in picoseconds */
+static inline u32 sparx5_clk_period(enum sparx5_core_clockfreq cclock)
+{
+ switch (cclock) {
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_250MHZ:
+ return 4000;
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_500MHZ:
+ return 2000;
+ case SPX5_CORE_CLOCK_625MHZ:
+ default:
+ return 1600;
+ }
+}Is this something which is used in the hot path?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main_regs.h@@ -0,0 +1,3922 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ + * Microchip Sparx5 Switch driver + * + * Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Technology Inc. + */ + +/* This file is autogenerated by cml-utils 2020-11-19 10:41:34 +0100. + * Commit ID: f34790e69dc252103e2cc3e85b1a5e4d9e3aa190 + */
How reproducible this is generation process? If you have to run it
again, will it keep the same order of lines?
Andrew