Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2020-12-14

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix use of proc_fs

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-12-12 19:49:48
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:37:49 +0200 Yonatan Linik wrote:
proc_fs was used, in af_packet, without a surrounding #ifdef,
although there is no hard dependency on proc_fs.
That caused the initialization of the af_packet module to fail
when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n.

Specifically, proc_create_net() was used in af_packet.c,
and when it fails, packet_net_init() returns -ENOMEM.
It will always fail when the kernel is compiled without proc_fs,
because, proc_create_net() for example always returns NULL.

The calling order that starts in af_packet.c is as follows:
packet_init()
register_pernet_subsys()
register_pernet_operations()
__register_pernet_operations()
ops_init()
ops->init() (packet_net_ops.init=packet_net_init())
proc_create_net()

It worked in the past because register_pernet_subsys()'s return value
wasn't checked before this Commit 36096f2f4fa0 ("packet: Fix error path in
packet_init.").
It always returned an error, but was not checked before, so everything
was working even when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n.

The fix here is simply to add the necessary #ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Yonatan Linik <redacted>
Hm, I'm guessing you hit this on a kernel upgrade of a real system?
It seems like all callers to proc_create_net (and friends) interpret
NULL as an error, but only handful is protected by an ifdef.

I checked a few and none of them cares about the proc_dir_entry pointer
that gets returned. Should we perhaps rework the return values of the
function so that we can return success if !CONFIG_PROC_FS without
having to yield a pointer?

Obviously we can apply this fix so we can backport to 5.4 if you need
it. I think the ifdef is fine, since it's what other callers have.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 2b33e977a905..031f2b593720 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -4612,9 +4612,11 @@ static int __net_init packet_net_init(struct net *net)
 	mutex_init(&net->packet.sklist_lock);
 	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->packet.sklist);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 	if (!proc_create_net("packet", 0, net->proc_net, &packet_seq_ops,
 			sizeof(struct seq_net_private)))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
 
 	return 0;
 }
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help