Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 18 authors, 2021-01-11
STALE1990d LANDED

[patch 16/30] mfd: ab8500-debugfs: Remove the racy fiddling with irq_desc

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-10 19:53:40
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-gpio, linux-pci, linux-rdma, linux-s390, lkml, xen-devel

First of all drivers have absolutely no business to dig into the internals
of an irq descriptor. That's core code and subject to change. All of this
information is readily available to /proc/interrupts in a safe and race
free way.

Remove the inspection code which is a blatant violation of subsystem
boundaries and racy against concurrent modifications of the interrupt
descriptor.

Print the irq line instead so the information can be looked up in a sane
way in /proc/interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
---
 drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c |   16 +++-------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c
@@ -1513,24 +1513,14 @@ static int ab8500_interrupts_show(struct
 {
 	int line;
 
-	seq_puts(s, "name: number:  number of: wake:\n");
+	seq_puts(s, "name: number: irq: number of: wake:\n");
 
 	for (line = 0; line < num_interrupt_lines; line++) {
-		struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(line + irq_first);
-
-		seq_printf(s, "%3i:  %6i %4i",
+		seq_printf(s, "%3i:  %6i %4i %4i\n",
 			   line,
+			   line + irq_first,
 			   num_interrupts[line],
 			   num_wake_interrupts[line]);
-
-		if (desc && desc->name)
-			seq_printf(s, "-%-8s", desc->name);
-		if (desc && desc->action) {
-			struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
-
-			seq_printf(s, "  %s", action->name);
-			while ((action = action->next) != NULL)
-				seq_printf(s, ", %s", action->name);
 		}
 		seq_putc(s, '\n');
 	}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help