On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:45:56PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:

quoted

Should ptp_sysfs be extended with a "pulse" attribute with calls
enable() with only PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE set?

Yes, that would make sense.  It would bring sysfs back to feature
parity with the ioctls.

Which is a good thing?

Anyway, Christian, if you do decide to do that, here's some context why
I didn't do it when I added the additional knobs for periodic output:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04150.html