Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Link aggregation support
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Date: 2020-12-16 20:22:28
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 21:04, Vladimir Oltean [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:00:55PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:quoted
Support offloading of LAGs to hardware. LAGs may be attached to a bridge in which case VLANs, multicast groups, etc. are also offloaded as usual. Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.c | 8 +- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h | 5 + drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c | 21 ++ drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 5 + 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index eafe6bedc692..bd80b3939157 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c@@ -1189,7 +1189,8 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_set_mac_eee(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, } /* Mask of the local ports allowed to receive frames from a given fabric port */ -static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port) +static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port, + struct net_device **lag) { struct dsa_switch *ds = chip->ds; struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;@@ -1201,6 +1202,9 @@ static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port) list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) { if (dp->ds->index == dev && dp->index == port) { found = true; + + if (dp->lag_dev && lag) + *lag = dp->lag_dev; break; } }I'll let Andrew and Vivien have the decisive word, who are vastly more familiar with mv88e6xxx than I am, but to me it looks like a bit of a hack to put this logic here, especially since one of the two callers (i.e. half) doesn't even care about the LAG.quoted
@@ -1396,14 +1402,21 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_mac_setup(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip) static int mv88e6xxx_pvt_map(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port) { + struct net_device *lag = NULL; u16 pvlan = 0; if (!mv88e6xxx_has_pvt(chip)) return 0; /* Skip the local source device, which uses in-chip port VLAN */ - if (dev != chip->ds->index) - pvlan = mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(chip, dev, port); + if (dev != chip->ds->index) { + pvlan = mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(chip, dev, port, &lag); + + if (lag) { + dev = MV88E6XXX_G2_PVT_ADRR_DEV_TRUNK; + port = dsa_lag_id(chip->ds->dst, lag); + } + }What about the following, which should remove the need of modifying mv88e6xxx_port_vlan: static int mv88e6xxx_pvt_map(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port) { struct dsa_switch *ds = chip->ds; struct net_device *lag = NULL; u16 pvlan = 0; if (!mv88e6xxx_has_pvt(chip)) return 0; /* Skip the local source device, which uses in-chip port VLAN */ if (dev != ds->index) { pvlan = mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(chip, dev, port); struct dsa_switch *other_ds; struct dsa_port *other_dp; other_ds = dsa_switch_find(ds->dst->index, dev); other_dp = dsa_to_port(other_ds, port); /* XXX needs an explanation for the reinterpreted values of * dev and port */ if (other_dp->lag_dev) { dev = MV88E6XXX_G2_PVT_ADRR_DEV_TRUNK; port = dsa_lag_id(ds->dst, other_dp->lag_dev); } } return mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write(chip, dev, port, pvlan); }
Yeah I agree. This is really a left-over from the RFC that I meant to clean-up. I will change it for v5.
quoted
return mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write(chip, dev, port, pvlan); }@@ -5375,6 +5388,271 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_egress_floods(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, return err; }