Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] lockdep: Introduce in_softirq lockdep assert

On 2020/11/24 16:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:12:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

One liner would be:

	* Acceptable for protecting per-CPU resources accessed from BH
	
We can add:

	* Much like in_softirq() - semantics are ambiguous, use carefully. *


IIUC we basically want to protect the nc array and counter here:

Works for me, thanks!

Will add the above comment in v3.

Thanks.

.