Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] lockdep: Introduce in_softirq lockdep assert
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-11-24 08:12:02
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:12:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
One liner would be: * Acceptable for protecting per-CPU resources accessed from BH We can add: * Much like in_softirq() - semantics are ambiguous, use carefully. * IIUC we basically want to protect the nc array and counter here:
Works for me, thanks!