[PATCH bpf-next 02/11] selftest/bpf: relax btf_dedup test checks
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-10-29 00:59:18
Also in:
bpf
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [selftests] (test runners & infrastructure), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
Remove the requirement of a strictly exact string section contents. This used to be true when string deduplication was done through sorting, but with string dedup done through hash table, it's no longer true. So relax test harness to relax strings checks and, consequently, type checks, which now don't have to have exactly the same string offsets. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 34 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index 93162484c2ca..2ccc23b2a36f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c@@ -6652,7 +6652,7 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num) const void *test_btf_data, *expect_btf_data; const char *ret_test_next_str, *ret_expect_next_str; const char *test_strs, *expect_strs; - const char *test_str_cur, *test_str_end; + const char *test_str_cur; const char *expect_str_cur, *expect_str_end; unsigned int raw_btf_size; void *raw_btf;
@@ -6719,12 +6719,18 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num) goto done; } - test_str_cur = test_strs; - test_str_end = test_strs + test_hdr->str_len; expect_str_cur = expect_strs; expect_str_end = expect_strs + expect_hdr->str_len; - while (test_str_cur < test_str_end && expect_str_cur < expect_str_end) { + while (expect_str_cur < expect_str_end) { size_t test_len, expect_len; + int off; + + off = btf__find_str(test_btf, expect_str_cur); + if (CHECK(off < 0, "exp str '%s' not found: %d\n", expect_str_cur, off)) { + err = -1; + goto done; + } + test_str_cur = btf__str_by_offset(test_btf, off); test_len = strlen(test_str_cur); expect_len = strlen(expect_str_cur);
@@ -6741,15 +6747,8 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num) err = -1; goto done; } - test_str_cur += test_len + 1; expect_str_cur += expect_len + 1; } - if (CHECK(test_str_cur != test_str_end, - "test_str_cur:%p != test_str_end:%p", - test_str_cur, test_str_end)) { - err = -1; - goto done; - } test_nr_types = btf__get_nr_types(test_btf); expect_nr_types = btf__get_nr_types(expect_btf);
@@ -6775,10 +6774,15 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num) err = -1; goto done; } - if (CHECK(memcmp((void *)test_type, - (void *)expect_type, - test_size), - "type #%d: contents differ", i)) { + if (CHECK(btf_kind(test_type) != btf_kind(expect_type), + "type %d kind: exp %d != got %u\n", + i, btf_kind(expect_type), btf_kind(test_type))) { + err = -1; + goto done; + } + if (CHECK(test_type->info != expect_type->info, + "type %d info: exp %d != got %u\n", + i, expect_type->info, test_type->info)) { err = -1; goto done; }
--
2.24.1