On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 2:20 PM Willem de Bruijn
[off-list ref] wrote:

Thanks for that context. If it's not captured in the code, it would be
great to include in the commit message.

OK. I'll update the commit message.

From a quick scan, RFC 2427 does not appear to actually define the
Q.922 address. For that I ended up reading ITU-T doc "Q.922 : ISDN
data link layer specification for frame mode bearer services", section
3.2.

Yeah. Thanks for posting the name of the document. It's good to see
ITU's documents are published in multiple languages because this feels
more international :)