On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:08 PM Xie He [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:30 AM Willem de Bruijn
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Thanks for your ack!
quoted
Should this go to net if a bugfix though?
Yes, this should theoretically be a bug fix. But I didn't think this
was an important fix, because af_packet.c already had workarounds for
this issue for all drivers that didn't have header_ops. We can
separate this patch to make it go to "net" though, but I'm afraid that
this will cause merging conflicts between "net" and "net-next".
Yes, it might require holding off the other patches until net is
merged into net-next.
Packet sockets are likely not the only way these packets are received?
It changes mac_len as computed in __netif_receive_skb_core.
If there is no real bug that is fixed, net-next is fine.