Thread (35 messages) flat view 35 messages, 4 authors, 2020-10-02

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy dump

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-10-02 21:22:09

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:17:01 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:00:15 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:  
quoted
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 13:50 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:    
quoted
My thinking was that until kernel actually start using separate dump
policies user space can assume policy 0 is relevant. But yeah, merging
your changes first would probably be best.    
Works for me. I have it based on yours. Just updated my branch (top
commit is 4d5045adfe90), but I'll probably only actually email it out
once things are a bit more settled wrt. your changes.    
Forgot the link ...

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git/log/?h=genetlink-op-policy-export  
If it's not too late for you - do you want to merge the two series and
post everything together? Perhaps squashing patch 10 into something if
that makes sense?

You already seem to have it rebased.
FWIW earlier I said:

	if ((op.doit && nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_whatever_DO, idx)) ||
	    (op.dumpit && nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_whatever_DUMP, idx)))
		goto nla_put_failure;

 - we should probably also check GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP here?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help