Thread (35 messages) flat view 35 messages, 4 authors, 2020-10-02

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy dump

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-10-02 15:03:11

On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:58:33 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Or just give them both? I mean, in many (most?) cases they're anyway
going to be the same, so with the patches I posted you could just give
them the two different policy indexes, and they can be the same?  
Ah, I missed your posting!  
Huh, I even CC'ed you I think?
I filter stuff which is to:netdev cc:me and get to it when I read the
ML. There's too much of it.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201002090944.195891-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net/t/#u (local)

and userspace:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201002102609.224150-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net/t/#u (local)
quoted
 Like this?

[OP_POLICY]
   [OP]
      [DO]   -> u32
      [DUMP] -> u32  
Yeah, that'd work. I'd probably wonder if we shouldn't do

[OP_POLICY]
  [OP] -> (u32, u32)

in a struct with two u32's, since that's quite a bit more compact.
What do we do if the op doesn't have a dump or do callback?
0 is a valid policy ID, sadly :(
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help