On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:58:33 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Or just give them both? I mean, in many (most?) cases they're anyway
going to be the same, so with the patches I posted you could just give
them the two different policy indexes, and they can be the same?
Ah, I missed your posting!
Huh, I even CC'ed you I think?
I filter stuff which is to:netdev cc:me and get to it when I read the
ML. There's too much of it.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201002090944.195891-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net/t/#u (local)
and userspace:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201002102609.224150-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net/t/#u (local)
quoted
Like this?
[OP_POLICY]
[OP]
[DO] -> u32
[DUMP] -> u32
Yeah, that'd work. I'd probably wonder if we shouldn't do
[OP_POLICY]
[OP] -> (u32, u32)
in a struct with two u32's, since that's quite a bit more compact.
What do we do if the op doesn't have a dump or do callback?
0 is a valid policy ID, sadly :(