Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf, selftests: use bpf_tail_call_static where appropriate
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2020-09-24 22:03:45
Also in:
bpf
On 9/24/20 9:25 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:quoted
For those locations where we use an immediate tail call map index use the newly added bpf_tail_call_static() helper. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c | 12 ++++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c | 28 +++++++++---------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c | 14 +++++----- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c | 4 +-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c | 4 +-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c | 6 ++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c | 6 ++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 6 ++-- 8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)One nit, while you're at it, maybe it would be good to also address the samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c that is also using the immediate map index?
Sure, np, will add.