Thread (28 messages) flat view 28 messages, 7 authors, 2020-09-25

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf, selftests: use bpf_tail_call_static where appropriate

From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: 2020-09-24 19:32:26
Also in: bpf

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
For those locations where we use an immediate tail call map index use the
newly added bpf_tail_call_static() helper.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c  | 12 ++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c | 28 +++++++++----------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c | 14 +++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c |  4 +--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c   |  4 +--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c   |  6 ++--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c   |  6 ++--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c   |  6 ++--
 8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
One nit, while you're at it, maybe it would be good to also address the
samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c that is also using the immediate map index?

[...]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help