Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2020-08-18

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-18 09:09:33
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

Tang Bin [off-list ref] writes:
在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
quoted
quoted
In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
because in

this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
NULL' exists.

So please think about it, thanks.
I think you missed my comment below:
quoted
devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:

static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
{
	return NULL;
}
So I think this patch just creates a new bug and does not improve
anything.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help