Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: add support for forced LINK_DETACH command
From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-30 20:53:55
Also in:
bpf
On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:43 AM Song Liu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
On Jul 29, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] wrote: Add LINK_DETACH command to force-detach bpf_link without destroying it. It has the same behavior as auto-detaching of bpf_link due to cgroup dying for bpf_cgroup_link or net_device being destroyed for bpf_xdp_link. In such case, bpf_link is still a valid kernel object, but is defuncts and doesn't hold BPF program attached to corresponding BPF hook. This functionality allows users with enough access rights to manually force-detach attached bpf_link without killing respective owner process. This patch implements LINK_DETACH for cgroup, xdp, and netns links, mostly re-using existing link release handling code. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <redacted>The code looks good to me. My only question is, do we need both bpf_link_ops->detach and bpf_link_ops->release?I think so. release() is mandatory for final clean up, after the last FD was closed, so every type of bpf_link has to implement this. detach() is optional, though, and potentially can do different things than release(). It just so happens right now that three bpf_linkl types can re-use release as-is (with minimal change to netns release specifically for detach use case). So I think having two is better and more flexible.
I see. Thanks for the explanation. Acked-by: Song Liu <redacted>