[PATCH v2 02/16] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-20 03:33:45
Also in:
linux-block, linux-clk, linux-doc, linux-ide, linux-mm, linux-spi, linux-wireless, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest, x86 architecture (32-bit and 64-bit), x86 mm · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Andy Lutomirski, Peter Zijlstra
Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. As a precursor to removing[2] this[3] macro[4], refactor code to avoid its need. The original reason for its use here was to work around the #ifdef being the only place the variable was used. This is better expressed using IS_ENABLED() and a new code block where the variable can be used unconditionally. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ (local) [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ (local) Fixes: 1e01979c8f50 ("x86, numa: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted> --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 18 +++++++++--------- include/linux/page-flags-layout.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 8ee952038c80..b05f45e5e8e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c@@ -543,7 +543,6 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void) static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) { - unsigned long uninitialized_var(pfn_align); int i, nid; /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
@@ -571,15 +570,16 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) * If sections array is gonna be used for pfn -> nid mapping, check * whether its granularity is fine enough. */ -#ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS - pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment(); - if (pfn_align && pfn_align < PAGES_PER_SECTION) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "Node alignment %LuMB < min %LuMB, rejecting NUMA config\n", - PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20, - PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20); - return -EINVAL; + if (IS_ENABLED(NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS)) { + unsigned long pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment(); + + if (pfn_align && pfn_align < PAGES_PER_SECTION) { + pr_warn("Node alignment %LuMB < min %LuMB, rejecting NUMA config\n", + PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20, + PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20); + return -EINVAL; + } } -#endif if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi)) return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags-layout.h b/include/linux/page-flags-layout.h
index 71283739ffd2..e200eef6a7fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags-layout.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags-layout.h@@ -98,9 +98,11 @@ /* * We are going to use the flags for the page to node mapping if its in * there. This includes the case where there is no node, so it is implicit. + * Note that this #define MUST have a value so that it can be tested with + * the IS_ENABLED() macro. */ #if !(NODES_WIDTH > 0 || NODES_SHIFT == 0) -#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS +#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS 1 #endif #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING) && LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH == 0
--
2.25.1