Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 12 authors, 2020-06-15

Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-04 22:39:36
Also in: linux-block, linux-clk, linux-ide, linux-mm, linux-spi, linux-wireless, lkml

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
quoted
-#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
+#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS 1
but if we ever lose the 1 then the above will silently compile the code
within the IS_ENABLED() section out.
That's true, yes. I considered two other ways to do this:

1) smallest patch, but more #ifdef:
2) medium size, weird style:

and 3 is what I sent: biggest, but removes #ifdef

Any preference?
From a readbility POV I surely prefer #3. i"m just wary. Add a big fat
comment to the define might mitigate that, hmm?
Sure! I'll add it.

-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help