Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP
From: Edward Cree <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-31 22:06:35
Also in:
bpf
On 31/03/2020 04:43, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:quoted
Everything that a human operator can do, so can any program with the same capabilities/wheel bits. Especially as the API that the operator-tool uses *will* be open and documented. The Unix Way does not allow unscriptable interfaces, and heavily frowns at any kind of distinction between 'humans' and 'programs'.can you share a link on such philosophy?
It's not quite as explicit about it as I'd like, but http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877684 is the closest I can find right now. -ed