Thread (120 messages) 120 messages, 12 authors, 2020-05-13

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP

From: Edward Cree <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-31 22:06:35
Also in: bpf

On 31/03/2020 04:43, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
quoted
Everything that a human operator can do, so can any program with the
 same capabilities/wheel bits.  Especially as the API that the
 operator-tool uses *will* be open and documented.  The Unix Way does
 not allow unscriptable interfaces, and heavily frowns at any kind of
 distinction between 'humans' and 'programs'.
can you share a link on such philosophy?
It's not quite as explicit about it as I'd like, but
 http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877684
 is the closest I can find right now.

-ed
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help