Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2020-03-20

Re: [PATCH] bpf: explicitly memset the bpf_attr structure

From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-20 15:31:29
Also in: bpf, lkml


On 3/20/20 8:24 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 3/20/20 10:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
quoted
For the bpf syscall, we are relying on the compiler to properly zero out
the bpf_attr union that we copy userspace data into.  Unfortunately that
doesn't always work properly, padding and other oddities might not be
correctly zeroed, and in some tests odd things have been found when the
stack is pre-initialized to other values.

Fix this by explicitly memsetting the structure to 0 before using it.

Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <redacted>
Reported-by: John Stultz <redacted>
Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reported-by: Alistair Delva <redacted>
Cc: stable <redacted>
Link: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__android-2Dreview.googlesource.com_c_kernel_common_-2B_1235490&d=DwIDaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=Fz_Xc6psG64uMowK2qpH0gTLj0NQE7k1CTWb5fODVeg&s=WKW0vq8WBALfwsSq5xGGWwxuLWKfI0DNN9XVMc1DkcE&e= 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a91ad518c050..a4b1de8ea409 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3354,7 +3354,7 @@ static int bpf_map_do_batch(const union bpf_attr 
*attr,
  SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, 
unsigned int, size)
  {
-    union bpf_attr attr = {};
+    union bpf_attr attr;
      int err;
      if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -3366,6 +3366,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr 
__user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz
      size = min_t(u32, size, sizeof(attr));
      /* copy attributes from user space, may be less than 
sizeof(bpf_attr) */
+    memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
Thanks for the fix, there are a few more of these places. We would also 
need
to cover:

- bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd()
- bpf_map_get_info_by_fd()
- btf_get_info_by_fd()
Not sure whether in these places existing approach will cause
kernel failure or not. They did not call CHECK_ATTR, e.g.,
for bpf_prog_info structure.
Please add these as well to your fix.
quoted
      if (copy_from_user(&attr, uattr, size) != 0)
          return -EFAULT;

base-commit: 6c90b86a745a446717fdf408c4a8a4631a5e8ee3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help