On 3/19/20 3:46 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:14:57PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
quoted
+ * It is possible, though unlikely, that the key
+ * changes in between the up_read->down_read period.
+ * If the key becomes longer, we will have to
+ * allocate a larger buffer and redo the key read
+ * again.
+ */
+ if (!tmpbuf || unlikely(ret > tmpbuflen)) {
Shouldn't you check that tmpbuflen stays below buflen (why else
you had made copy of buflen otherwise)?
The check above this thunk:
if ((ret > 0) && (ret <= buflen)) {
will make sure that ret will not be larger than buflen. So tmpbuflen
will never be bigger than buflen.
Cheers,
Longman