Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x)
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2020-02-28 11:03:37
Also in:
lkml
Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 09:06:02AM CET, vadym.kochan@plvision.eu wrote:
Hi Jiri, On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:30:54PM CET, vadym.kochan@plvision.eu wrote:quoted
Marvell Prestera 98DX326x integrates up to 24 ports of 1GbE with 8 ports of 10GbE uplinks or 2 ports of 40Gbps stacking for a largely wireless SMB deployment. This driver implementation includes only L1 & basic L2 support. The core Prestera switching logic is implemented in prestera.c, there is an intermediate hw layer between core logic and firmware. It is implemented in prestera_hw.c, the purpose of it is to encapsulate hw related logic, in future there is a plan to support more devices with different HW related configurations. The following Switchdev features are supported: - VLAN-aware bridge offloading - VLAN-unaware bridge offloading - FDB offloading (learning, ageing) - Switchport configuration Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andrii Savka <redacted> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <redacted> Signed-off-by: Serhiy Boiko <redacted> Signed-off-by: Serhiy Pshyk <redacted> Signed-off-by: Taras Chornyi <redacted> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <redacted> ---[SNIP]quoted
quoted
+}; + +struct mvsw_msg_cmd { + u32 type; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 status; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_common_request { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_common_response { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +union mvsw_msg_switch_param { + u32 ageing_timeout; +}; + +struct mvsw_msg_switch_attr_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + union mvsw_msg_switch_param param; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_switch_init_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; + u32 port_count; + u32 mtu_max; + u8 switch_id; + u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_port_autoneg_param { + u64 link_mode; + u8 enable; + u8 fec; +}; + +struct mvsw_msg_port_cap_param { + u64 link_mode; + u8 type; + u8 fec; + u8 transceiver; +}; + +union mvsw_msg_port_param { + u8 admin_state; + u8 oper_state; + u32 mtu; + u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; + u8 accept_frm_type; + u8 learning; + u32 speed; + u8 flood; + u32 link_mode; + u8 type; + u8 duplex; + u8 fec; + u8 mdix; + struct mvsw_msg_port_autoneg_param autoneg; + struct mvsw_msg_port_cap_param cap; +}; + +struct mvsw_msg_port_attr_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 attr; + u32 port; + u32 dev; + union mvsw_msg_port_param param; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_port_attr_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; + union mvsw_msg_port_param param; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_port_stats_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; + u64 stats[MVSW_PORT_CNT_MAX]; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_port_info_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 port; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_port_info_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; + u32 hw_id; + u32 dev_id; + u16 fp_id; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_vlan_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 port; + u32 dev; + u16 vid; + u8 is_member; + u8 is_tagged; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_fdb_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 port; + u32 dev; + u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; + u16 vid; + u8 dynamic; + u32 flush_mode; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_event { + u16 type; + u16 id; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +union mvsw_msg_event_fdb_param { + u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; +}; + +struct mvsw_msg_event_fdb { + struct mvsw_msg_event id; + u32 port_id; + u32 vid; + union mvsw_msg_event_fdb_param param; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +union mvsw_msg_event_port_param { + u32 oper_state; +}; + +struct mvsw_msg_event_port { + struct mvsw_msg_event id; + u32 port_id; + union mvsw_msg_event_port_param param; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_bridge_cmd { + struct mvsw_msg_cmd cmd; + u32 port; + u32 dev; + u16 bridge; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +struct mvsw_msg_bridge_ret { + struct mvsw_msg_ret ret; + u16 bridge; +} __packed __aligned(4); + +#define fw_check_resp(_response) \ +({ \ + int __er = 0; \ + typeof(_response) __r = (_response); \ + if (__r->ret.cmd.type != MVSW_MSG_TYPE_ACK) \ + __er = -EBADE; \ + else if (__r->ret.status != MVSW_MSG_ACK_OK) \ + __er = -EINVAL; \ + (__er); \ +}) + +#define __fw_send_req_resp(_switch, _type, _request, _response, _wait) \Please try to avoid doing functions in macros like this one and the previous one.quoted
+({ \ + int __e; \ + typeof(_switch) __sw = (_switch); \ + typeof(_request) __req = (_request); \ + typeof(_response) __resp = (_response); \ + __req->cmd.type = (_type); \ + __e = __sw->dev->send_req(__sw->dev, \ + (u8 *)__req, sizeof(*__req), \ + (u8 *)__resp, sizeof(*__resp), \ + _wait); \ + if (!__e) \ + __e = fw_check_resp(__resp); \ + (__e); \ +}) + +#define fw_send_req_resp(_sw, _t, _req, _resp) \ + __fw_send_req_resp(_sw, _t, _req, _resp, 0) + +#define fw_send_req_resp_wait(_sw, _t, _req, _resp, _wait) \ + __fw_send_req_resp(_sw, _t, _req, _resp, _wait) + +#define fw_send_req(_sw, _t, _req) \This should be function, not defineYeah, I understand your point, but here was the reason: all packed structs which defined here in prestera_hw.c are used for transmission request/return to/from the firmware, each of the struct requires to have req/ret member (depends if it is request or return from the firmware), and the purpose of the macro is to avoid case when someone can forget to add req/ret member to the new such structure.
You should refactor your code to make this cleaner. Define acting as a function working with random structures counting with 2 member names in them, that is not nice :/
quoted
quoted
+({ \ + struct mvsw_msg_common_response __re; \ + (fw_send_req_resp(_sw, _t, _req, &__re)); \ +}) +Regards, Vadym Kochan,