Re: [PATCH 03/16] dt-bindings: atmel-tcb: add microchip,<chip>-tcb
From: <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-10 14:29:35
Also in:
dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-can, linux-devicetree, linux-iio, linux-media, linux-rtc, linux-spi, lkml
On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:quoted
Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for microchip,sam9x60-tcb. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon". - <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5" +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb", + "simple-mfd", "syscon". + <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.
OK! I'll double check it.
It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com/ (local)
I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch?
-- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com