Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:

quoted

+struct bpf_map_def {
+	unsigned int type;
+	unsigned int key_size;
+	unsigned int value_size;
+	unsigned int max_entries;
+	unsigned int map_flags;
+	unsigned int inner_map_idx;
+	unsigned int numa_node;
+};

Didn't we agree on no new bpf_map_def ABI in libbpf, and that all
additions should be BTF-based?

-Toke

We use libbpf on pre BTF kernels so in this case I think it makes
sense to add these fields. Having inner_map_idx there should allow
us to remove some other things we have sitting around.

.John