On Friday, 11 October 2019 7:56 Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 08:17:43PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:59:40PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
+
+/* generic notification handler */
+static void ethnl_std_notify(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int
cmd,>>
Better "common" comparing to "standard", I believe.
That's similar to ethnl_std_parse(), the idea is that this is the
standard handler for notifications which are triggered without
additional data and the message is the same as reply to corresponding
"GET" request (which is generated by the standard ethnl_get_doit()
handler). Notifications for actions and notifications for SET
commands which cannot be generated this standard way will have to
use their own (nonstandard) handler.
So "default"? The "standard" sounds rather weird to me. It isn't any
"standard" :)
Yes, "default" sounds fine.
Michal