Re: [PATCH net] mvpp2: fix panic on module removal

From
Antoine Tenart <hidden>
Date
2019-08-01 12:00:42
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Matteo Croce, 2019-08-01
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:46:39PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:18 AM Antoine Tenart
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:31:16PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index c51f1d5b550b..5002d51fc9d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
@@ -5760,7 +5760,6 @@ static int mvpp2_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
      mvpp2_dbgfs_cleanup(priv);

      flush_workqueue(priv->stats_queue);
-     destroy_workqueue(priv->stats_queue);

      fwnode_for_each_available_child_node(fwnode, port_fwnode) {
              if (priv->port_list[i]) {
@@ -5770,6 +5769,8 @@ static int mvpp2_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
              i++;
      }
Shouldn't you also move flush_workqueue() here?
I think that that flush it's unneeded at all, as all port remove calls
cancel_delayed_work_sync().

I tried removing it and it doesn't crash on rmmod.
I was wondering this, and looking at the documentation it seems to me
removing flush_workqueue() should be fine.

Thanks!
Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2019-08-05
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help