On 6/10/19 9:11 PM, Alex Elder wrote:

On 6/10/19 5:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:53 PM Alex Elder [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add the binding definitions for the "qcom,ipa" device tree node.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml     | 180 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0037fc278a61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

New bindings are preferred to be dual GPL-2.0 and BSD-2-Clause. But
that's really a decision for the submitter.

Thanks Rob.  I'll ask Qualcomm if there's any problem
with doing that; I presume not.  If I re-submit this
with dual copyright, I will include your Reviewed-by
despite the change, OK?

FYI I have the go-ahead to use dual GPL-2.0 and BSD-2-Clause
bindings on this, and will mark it that way whenever I next
post this code for review.

I will also be updating other Qualcomm bindings to have a
dual copyright (in a separate series).  We'll want to
get an ack from appropriate Code Aurora developers on
those (I'll provide more detail at the time those get
posted).

					-Alex

					-Alex

quoted

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>