Thread (32 messages) read the whole thread 32 messages, 8 authors, 2019-07-16

Re: [PATCH net 2/4] tcp: tcp_fragment() should apply sane memory limits

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2019-07-11 09:19:52
Subsystem: networking [general], networking [tcp], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Neal Cardwell, Linus Torvalds


On 7/11/19 9:28 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
quoted
On Jul 10, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:



On 7/10/19 8:53 PM, Prout, Andrew - LLSC - MITLL wrote:
quoted
Our initial rollout was v4.14.130, but I reproduced it with v4.14.132 as well, reliably for the samba test and once (not reliably) with synthetic test I was trying. A patched v4.14.132 with this patch partially reverted (just the four lines from tcp_fragment deleted) passed the samba test.

The synthetic test was a pair of simple send/recv test programs under the following conditions:
-The send socket was non-blocking
-SO_SNDBUF set to 128KiB
-The receiver NIC was being flooded with traffic from multiple hosts (to induce packet loss/retransmits)
-Load was on both systems: a while(1) program spinning on each CPU core
-The receiver was on an older unaffected kernel
SO_SNDBUF to 128KB does not permit to recover from heavy losses,
since skbs needs to be allocated for retransmits.
Would it make sense to always allow the alloc in tcp_fragment when coming from __tcp_retransmit_skb() through the retransmit-timer ?
4.15+ kernels have :

if (unlikely((sk->sk_wmem_queued >> 1) > sk->sk_sndbuf &&
    tcp_queue != TCP_FRAG_IN_WRITE_QUEUE)) {


Meaning that things like TLP will succeed.

Anything we add in TCP stack to overcome the SO_SNDBUF by twice the limit _will_ be exploited at scale.

I am not sure we want to continue to support small SO_SNDBUF values, as this makes no sense today.

We use 64 MB auto tuning limit, and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat to 1 MB.

I would rather work (when net-next reopens) on better collapsing at rtx to allow reduction of the overhead.


Something like :
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index f6a9c95a48edb234e4d4e21bf585744fbaf9a0a7..d5c85986209cd162cf39edb787b1385cb2c8b630 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2860,7 +2860,7 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_early_retrans = 3;
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery = TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION;
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_slow_start_after_idle = 1; /* By default, RFC2861 behavior.  */
-       net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_retrans_collapse = 1;
+       net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_retrans_collapse = 3;
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_reordering = 300;
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_dsack = 1;
        net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_app_win = 31;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index d61264cf89ef66b229ecf797c1abfb7fcdab009f..05cd264f98b084f62eaf2ef9d6e14a392670d02c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -3015,8 +3015,6 @@ static bool tcp_collapse_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
        next_skb_size = next_skb->len;
 
-       BUG_ON(tcp_skb_pcount(skb) != 1 || tcp_skb_pcount(next_skb) != 1);
-
        if (next_skb_size) {
                if (next_skb_size <= skb_availroom(skb))
                        skb_copy_bits(next_skb, 0, skb_put(skb, next_skb_size),
@@ -3054,8 +3052,6 @@ static bool tcp_collapse_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 /* Check if coalescing SKBs is legal. */
 static bool tcp_can_collapse(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-       if (tcp_skb_pcount(skb) > 1)
-               return false;
        if (skb_cloned(skb))
                return false;
        /* Some heuristics for collapsing over SACK'd could be invented */
@@ -3114,7 +3110,7 @@ int __tcp_retransmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int segs)
        struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
        struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
        unsigned int cur_mss;
-       int diff, len, err;
+       int diff, len, maxlen, err;
 
 
        /* Inconclusive MTU probe */
@@ -3165,12 +3161,13 @@ int __tcp_retransmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int segs)
                        return -ENOMEM;
 
                diff = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
+               maxlen = (sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_retrans_collapse & 2) ? len : cur_mss;
+               if (skb->len < maxlen)
+                       tcp_retrans_try_collapse(sk, skb, maxlen);
                tcp_set_skb_tso_segs(skb, cur_mss);
                diff -= tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
                if (diff)
                        tcp_adjust_pcount(sk, skb, diff);
-               if (skb->len < cur_mss)
-                       tcp_retrans_try_collapse(sk, skb, cur_mss);
        }
 
        /* RFC3168, section 6.1.1.1. ECN fallback */
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help